« Karl Rove’s 12-Step Program to Dry-Drunk Power: A Primer | Main | Give peevishness a chance »

April 20, 2005

Comments

Usually I'm in one hundred percent agreement with you, Dr. Carpenter.But of Tom DeLay, to poorly paraphrase Mark Twain, the reports of his impending political demise are exaggerated.

I do not for a minute think that any serious ethics charges will be leveled against DeLay, nor do I think he will be ousted from his Texas U.S.Congressional District.

Outside newspapers as The New York Times and The Washington Post and the Internet, DeLay's ethical problems bearly register on the "mainstream" media's radar. Nor
I do think Congressional Democrats have the stomach to push the issue, addicted as they are to Indian casino campaign donations.

But his ethics are being questioned by the Houston Chronicle and some smaller local south Texas papers. Even Texans can get fed up with assholes and vote him out of office in 2006 if he keeps on doing what he has always done.

It looks like today the House Ethics Committee will be taking uncle tom to task. Believe it or not, there still are a few sane republicans who do not pander to fools. I harbor no ill will toward them, but to the idiot theo-neo-con types, I do.


Paint me stupid, but how in the world can anyone contend that
" Nor (do)
I do (sic) think Congressional Democrats have the stomach to push the issue, addicted as they are to Indian casino campaign donations."?

Seems to me, suggestions rampant that Delay is tarred by association, and may even be implicated, in the scalping of NA constituents who just wanted to buy into the Easysleaze of Lobbyist / CongressCritter incest to the tune of 60 mil would be more than enough incentive for Dems to further gently and kindly assist this "man" in opening ~all~ of his veins, a spectacle he's been treating us to on an on-going, almost daily basis - paricularly if, as said, they (Dems) are "addicted" to "Indian casino campaign donations."

I'll believe DeLay's going down when I actually see it (just like "Klansman" Trent Lott)

On the other hand, you just may be right about Bill Frist. Couldn't happen to a nicer guy.

And if the Rethugs can't get anyone better than Tricky Dick's son-in-law to challenge Hillary for her Senate seat in 2006, she's virtually running unchallenged and can concentrate on running for Pres in 2008.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Housekeeping Items

  • Visits to date




  • to P.M. Carpenter's Commentary