Where do little bullies go? Some, to Breitbart.

Why of course. It's all the sniveling media's fault.

That's the conclusion reached by Breitbart.com about the unconscionable Post story, "which implied without evidence that Mitt Romney was a homophobic bully" [emphasis added].

How did Breitbart reach this conclusion? Mostly through the Post having changed eight words in its orginal 5,500-word piece to a clarifying 14, none of which changed the thrust of the piece's importance.

Which is?

Certainly not that Mitt Romney did stupid things as a teenage schoolboy. The now-manifest fact that Mitt Romney could not, as a candidate for the U.S. presidency, simply confess to what everyone already knows and understands and accepts--that teenage schoolboys do stupid things--is, however, rather disturbing.

Yet by this, Breitbart is unbothered--as are all the other little bullies who grow up to be big bullies of the pseudoconservative persuasion.

Comments

[SueMe]

I used to watch CNBC and see the people there fawn over Jamie Dimond as though he was the God of Wall Street....well what goes around comes around and now it's Jamie's turn to show just how stupid he is and was! Every time one of my winger family member's tells me we need a business manager in the WH...I use this instance to rebut their theory.