« Triumphalism kills | Main | David Brooks and the politics of audacity »

November 12, 2012

Comments

You can thank the legacy of all the teachers and parents who, rather than get into the weeds of explaining niceties of grammar, merely screeched "Wrong! Johnnie and I! Not Johnnie and me!" until the poor chilluns had it ineradicably embedded into their psyches that any "____ and ____" construction must never descend into the abominable error of using the accusative case.

Drat, where's the edit button? As the correct screech should read: "Wrong! Johnnie and I! Not me and Johnnie!"

I too have been troubled by the loss of the expected objective case in a coordinate construction for my entire sentient life. However, I read an explanation on Language Log that sounds more plausible than the hyper-correction explanation given by Janicket and many others elsewhere.

In contemporary English, a coordinate conjunction, particularly "and", governs the case of pronouns below it and shields them, so to speak, from the preposition or verb that would govern them in a non-coordinate construction.

I am too conservative to go along with this newish usage myself, but at least there is a cogent explanation for it. Since we are in a transitional period for this usage, there is little consistency. Now you see it, now you don't, sometimes even in the same paragraph or utterance.

Only in America would our helpless children need to be shielded from the wrath of a preposition. Now, how can we protect them from dangling participles?

I think a semi-colon would do the trick; hoping.

What about the horror of:

"If you have questions, speak to Bob or myself."

Beyond gruesome.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Posts and Archives



  • to P.M. Carpenter's Commentary




  • to P.M. Carpenter's Commentary