« Congress beats Palin, 50-34 | Main | Chait's Scarborough Fair Game »

February 12, 2013

Comments

Zzzzzzzz..... Thanks for the nap. Now I'm refreshed and able to participate in Fat Tuesday!

I love the State of the Union address - and the rebuttals.

Presidential election campaignsgo on for a year or two of sound bites: commercials, campaign speeches, opening and closing statements for "debates", "debates", television "news reports", and so on. The SOTU is something else again.

The president gets to stand and look at the House, the senate, the Supreme Court, Americans and people around the world and tell a complete, whole story of where he stands and where he intends to go. There is no real time limit. There is no Mitt Romney interrupting him. There is nowhere to hide. The supposedly most powerful man in the world is held accountable in public.

Of course there are no big surprises. That is a good thing. Freedom of the press (lazy, incompetent and biased as they might be) ensures a remarkable amount of transparency in our government. If you have ever had to go through an annual review, you know that while there are rarely surprises, there is something especially onerous about justifying your last year of work. You cannot get by with comparisons of co-workers, no grading on the curve ("Well, I don't suck as much as Mitt Romney.") Let's face it we are the most demanding bosses in the world.

If that is not enough, one (or two) of his co-workers who wishes him the worst gets rip him apart in rebuttal, uninterupted with no real tme constraints.

Then they pass everything around to everyone in the company for review and comment.

Imagine telling Caesar Augustus to submit to that. Then, try to get everyone to believe it is boring.

The most btrying for me were Bill Clinton's. Then, I realized that the 60 seconds he spent on some small arcane matter (not worthy of a SOTU address) was one of the most important things in the speech to a million or more people. If Obama has a line about the USPS, and if you find that boring, imagine being a postal employee or their family.

I know, I am always the contrarian. :-)

If Obama weren't such a compelling speaker I'd be tempted to agree with you, or rather that Politico piece. I used to like to watch Clinton too. George not so much but I did out of some demented foblo. Lately however the GOP replies have been such comic gold, particularly the TP reply, that I wouldn't miss it for the world.

Obama calls out the Supreme Court over Americans United.

A congressman yells, "You lie!"

Ted nugent in attendance.

Maybe one congressman will cane another one to death.

Robert -- You're correct in every detail. But I still can't watch. I read about it the next day. The full text is readily available. The real-time viewing is both far too slow and far too compelling at the same time, if that makes any sense.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Recent Posts and Archives



  • to P.M. Carpenter's Commentary




  • to P.M. Carpenter's Commentary