I never liked the "character" issue's rude interference into American politics. Other than it usually being just plain rude, I never liked its cast-the-first-stone quality, either. But I chiefly dislike character's interference for the simple reason that it's commonly raised by political thugs who intend it as an irrelevant distraction from what actually matters -- that being the targeted character's policy positions.
Whatever Thomas Jefferson did or didn't do with a certain Sally at night had nothing to do with whether or not he might be inclined to unilaterally double the size of the United States; "Ma, Ma, where's my Pa" hardly addressed how Grover Cleveland might confront a deep economic depression, which he eventually did (poorly); and Bill Clinton's advertised dalliances were, of course, about anything and everything but his fiscal and foreign policies, two little items that normally influence this nation more than the particular lovemaking techniques of a bimbo from California.
Yet each of the above had his enemies and each of the above's enemies dwelled on the personal. The personal may have been titillating, and it may have aroused the wrath of the moralistically motivated, but it had nothing to do with the nation's business. And our business is, simply, what it's all about. Give me the William James School of Pragmatism kind of politics any day over any Freudian interest in a president's metaphorical thoughts on cigars. Who cares.
But every now and then comes a candidate with a personal history that rocks even the most pragmatically inclined. And Hizzoner Giuliani is one such candidate.
"Republican presidential hopeful Rudy Giuliani acknowledged again Friday that he made a mistake when he recommended Bernard Kerik to be the nation's homeland security chief," understated the New York Times on Rudy's understatement.
"The acknowledgment followed a report ... that the former New York City mayor was warned about Kerik's relationship with a company with suspected ties to organized crime even before Giuliani appointed Kerik as New York City police commissioner."
A mistake? No. A mistake is forgetting to tell your wife you'll be late for dinner. A mistake is misfiling your car insurance bill. A mistake is inattentively showing up for a 10AM dentist appointment at 11AM. The parameters of "mistake," however, most decidedly do not encompass your naming a mobbed-up character as police commissioner, then compounding said ill-defined mistake by recommending said mobster to be the nation's top security guy.
No, that sort of thing transcends mere "mistaken-ness." Indeed, it's that sort of thing that gives "mistake" a good name. So let us not conspire with Rudy "Boo-Boo," as his mob buddies might nickname him to great amusement, in abusing "mistake" by agreeing that his actions were anything but outright dishonest, shady, unscrupulous, fraudulent and borderline racketeering.
Now that's personal -- and for once, utterly relevant. Those adjectives may say nothing about what Rudy might do about taxes or Iraq, but they say a lot about Rudy the administrator, the executive, the man.
Guess what you missed--Rudy was one of the 19 who did 911 bombing.
Posted by: genrikh yagoda | March 31, 2007 at 10:59 AM
The only candidate we can trust to not be a total sell out to Corporations and Israel is Ron Paul who has proved it with his voting record as a congressman over the last 9 years. And that's why the media won't talk about him. To find out more about this real patriot check out:
www.WeSupportRonPaul.com
Posted by: glowform | March 31, 2007 at 11:34 AM
It's hard for me to imagine why these high level criminals believe they deserve any sort of entitlement, but they're highly revered in their own circles, i.e., the US government--largest criminal enterprise in the history of the planet.
Posted by: Solo | March 31, 2007 at 12:02 PM
Guiliani, instead of ordering a yellow ribbon circling a crime scene at ground zero, he orders the trucks to carry the evidence to a city dump on Staten Island. What a great piece of S--T !!!
Posted by: endo | March 31, 2007 at 01:05 PM
I totally agree with Endo: Ground zero was a crime scene and no attempt was made to treat it as such - at any time. They bray all day and nite about 9/11 being sooooo horrific - why wasn't it investigated properly?
That's the best reason to listen to the alternate theories.
Posted by: babaloo | March 31, 2007 at 01:21 PM
In the mirrorspeak of the moment when the Feds declared organized crime vanquished, I considered that the point at which the mob took over the US government. I believe Skully Bush attests to that. What a character!
Posted by: Vic Anderson | April 01, 2007 at 09:01 AM